Symbolic Meanings in the Social Interaction of Santri in the Pesantren Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i3.698Keywords:
Symbolic Interaction, Social Interaction, Pesantren TraditionAbstract
This study examines the symbolic meaning of students' social interactions with ustadz, teachers, fellow students, and parents at the Muhammadiyah Boarding School Al-Manar South Sumatra. Using a descriptive qualitative approach based on case studies, this study used observation, interviews, and documentation as data collection techniques. Analysis techniques included coding and categorizing the collected data to identify related patterns and themes. This study's findings revealed that students' interactions with ustadz and teachers are symbolized by bowing and kissing the hand, reflecting respect, religious obedience, and social hierarchy. These traditions strengthen the cultural and spiritual bonds between students and their teachers. Among fellow students, calling each other akhi (brother) and ukhti (sister) symbolizes respect, unity, and leadership development. These interactions help strengthen social structures and foster character development. Interactions with parents expressed through hand kissing and santri sambangan (visits) reflect respect, emotional connection, and community support. This symbolic interaction serves as character education for the students, instilling social ethics and cultural continuity. However, the focus of the study on one pesantren limits its generalizability. Future research should explore symbolic interactions in other pesantren to provide a broader perspective. The originality of this study lies in its focus on the role of symbols in shaping hierarchies and social identities in pesantren. By examining the pesantren educational environment, this study offers new insights into how symbols influence the dynamics of power, order, and communal values.
References
[1] Abidin, Z., & Sirojuddin, A. (2024). Developing Spiritual Intelligence Through The Internalization of Sufistic Values: Learning From Pesantren Education. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i2.783
[2] Albar, M. K., Hamami, T., Sukiman, & Badrus, A. R. Z. (2024). Ecological Pesantren as an Innovation in Islamic Religious Education Curriculum: Is It Feasible? Edukasia Islamika Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v9i1.8324
[3] Andaya, B. W. (2018). Gender Legacies and Modern Transitions. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628837-2
[4] Aufa, M. T. (2023). Interviewed by grade VII santri on February 26, 2023.
[5] Ayoub, P. M., Wallace, S. J., & Zepeda-Millán, C. (2014). Triangulation in Social Movement Research. In D. della Porta (Ed.), Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research (pp. 67–96). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0004
[6] Azhari, A. (2023). Interviewed by Mudir Pesantren on June 28, 2023.
[7] Azra, A. (2015). Genealogy of Indonesian Islamic Education: Roles in the Modernization of Muslim Society. Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 4(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v4i1.63
[8] Azzahra, H. I. R. (2023). Interviewed by Supervisor of santri on July 14, 2023.
[9] Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols. In Theories of Memory (p. 440). London: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782119-3
[10] Basyar, S., Zulhannan, Z., & Muzakki, A. (2020). Islamic Characters Education Construct of Young Generation Based on Local Cultural Values of Lampung Indigenous Peoples. Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 25(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v25i1.1739
[11] Bellous, J. E. (2021). Spiritual care as the foundation for a child’s religious education. Religions, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110954
[12] Bolis, D., & Schilbach, L. (2020). ‘I Interact Therefore I Am’: The Self as a Historical Product of Dialectical Attunement. Topoi, 39(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9574-0
[13] Burkitt, I. (2021). The Emotions in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Personality, Emotion and Motivation in Social Relations and Activity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(4), 797–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09615-x
[14] Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, Meaning, and Action: The Past, Present, and Future of Symbolic Interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396
[15] Efendi, A. A. (2023). Interviewed by grade IX santri on September 1, 2023.
[16] Fay, N., Walker, B., Swoboda, N., & Garrod, S. (2018). How to Create Shared Symbols. Cognitive Science, 42, 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12600
[17] Fijriah, H., & Ellisa, E. (2022). The Role of “Ngalap Barokah” in Rapid Urban Development: Case Study of Tebuireng, Jombang. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 7(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v7i2.16385
[18] Firmansyah, F. (2024). Pendidikan Etika Sosial Berbasis Pesantren: Internalisasi Melalui Tradisi Santri. Malang: Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup.
[19] Firmansyah, SA, R., & Munir. (2024). The Urgency of Social Ethics in Santri Tradition at Muhammadiyah’s Pesantren. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.991
[20] Fuadi, A. N. (2023). Interviewed by grade XI santri on July 14, 2023.
[21] Hallett, T., & Hawbaker, A. (2021). The Case for an Inhabited Institutionalism in Organizational Research: Interaction, Coupling, and Change Reconsidered. Theory and Society, 50(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09412-2
[22] Hammad, S. H., Daher-Nashif, S., Kane, T., & Al-Wattary, N. (2024). Sociocultural Insights on Dementia Care-Giving in Arab and Muslim Communities: The Perspectives of Family Care-givers. Ageing & Society, 44(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X22000277
[23] Hutchins, E. (2020). The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction. In S. C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality (pp. 375–397). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517
[24] Ilhami, M. W., Nurfajriani, W. V., Mahendra, A., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Penerapan Metode Studi Kasus Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(9), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11180128
[25] Irawan, A. (2018). Akar Sejarah Etika Pesantren di Nusantara, Dari Era Sriwijaya Sampai Pesantren Tebu Ireng dan Ploso. Tangerang: Pustaka IIMaN.
[26] Katapidi, I. (2021). Heritage Policy Meets Community Praxis: Widening Conservation Approaches in The Traditional Villages of Central Greece. Journal of Rural Studies, 81(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.012
[27] Maimun, A., Indiyanto, A., & Mujab, M. (2020). Educating Islamic Values through Wiwitan Tradition. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 14(2), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2020.14.2.359-386
[28] Menggo, S., Ndiung, S., & Pandor, P. (2021). Semiotic Construction in Promoting Intercultural Communication: A Tiba Meka Rite of Manggarai, Indonesia. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 18(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.3726/cul022021.0010
[29] Moran, D. (2024). The Phenomenology of Joint Agency: The Implicit Structures of the Shared Life-world. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09788-1
[30] Mushlih, A. (2023). Interviewed by grade XII santri on July 2, 2023.
[31] Nashir, H., & Jinan, M. (2018). Re-Islamisation: The conversion of subculture from Abangan intoSantri in Surakarta. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v8i1.1-28
[32] Newell, S. (2018). The affectiveness of Symbols: Materiality, Magicality, and the Limits of the Antisemiotic Turn. Current Anthropology, 59(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/696071
[33] Noone, R. J. (2020). Nuclear Family Emotional Process. In M. N. Keller & R. J. Noone (Eds.), Handbook of Bowen Family Systems Theory and Research Methods A Systems Model for Family Research (p. 13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351103282
[34] Nugroho, F. H., Mahmudi, A., Tursila, T., Mispani, M., Jaenullah, J., & Ernawati, E. (2021). The Tradition of Kissing Kyai’s Hand: A Case Study at Islamic Boarding School of Raudlatul Hidayah Sulusuban Central Lampung. Journal of Research in Islamic Education, 3(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.25217/jrie.v3i1.1599
[35] Nurhidin, E. (2023). Pesantren Tradition-based Nationalism Education Model on Religious Moderation Perspectives in Kediri, East Java. Edukasia Islamika, 8(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v8i1.359
[36] Orsini, A. (2024). Sociological Theory From Comte to Postcolonialism. NY: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52539-1
[37] Prasetyo, M. A. M., Fadlin, I., & Madman, R. (2023). Towards A Bully-Free Pesantren: The Role of Educational Management With Adaptive Psychology and Mental Health Interventions. At-Ta’dib, 18(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v18i1.9458
[38] Rae, G. (2022). Laclau on Misunderstanding and the Genesis of Collective Identity. Thesis Eleven, 170(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513622109843
[39] Ramadhansyah, M., & Wijaya, C. (2023). Discipline Court Management Program for the Character Development of Students. Edutec : Journal of Education And Technology, 6(4), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v6i4.541
[40] Rohman, A. (2017). Pesantren as a Basis for Internalization of Pluralistic Values for Preparing a Democratic Citizens in a Diverse Society. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 25(2), 419. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.25.2.1324
[41] Stryker, S. (2017). Symbolic Interactionism: Themes and Variations. In Social Psychology (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129723-1
[42] Sumerau, J. E. (2020). Teaching Symbolic Interactionism [Review of The Social Self and Everyday Life: Understanding the World through Symbolic Interactionism, by K. Charmaz, S. R. Harris, & L. Irvine]. Symbolic Interaction, 43(4), 767–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.510
[43] Syauqi, M. (2023). Interviewed by grade VII santri on February 26, 2023.
[44] Takril, H. (2023). Interviewed by grade XI santri on September 1, 2023.
[45] Tektigul, Z., Bayadilova-Altybayeva, A., Sadykova, S., Iskindirova, S., Kushkimbayeva, A., & Zhumagul, D. (2023). Language is a Symbol System that Carries Culture. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 11(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2022.562756.2781
[46] Thani, T. M., Idriss, I. D., Muhammad, A. A., & Idris, H. S. (2021). The Teaching Methods and Techniques Of The Prophet (Saw): An Exploratory Study. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 6(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v6i1.128
[47] Tunc, D. U. (2019). Symbolically mediated interaction and perspective-taking: A social-relational perspective on social cognitive development. Avant, 10(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2019.03.28
[48] Turner, S. F., Cardinal, L. B., & Burton, R. M. (2017). Research Design for Mixed Methods: A Triangulation-Based Framework and Roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610808
[49] Widiyono, A. (2022). Internalizing Aswaja-based Character Education through School Environment Design and Collaborative Strategy. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 5(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v5i1.2324
[50] Yasin, M., & Khasbulloh, M. N. (2022). Constructing Ethical Critical Thinking At Pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i2.19028
[51] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. California: SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
[52] Yumnah, S. (2021). Character Education with Islamic Insights of The Nusantara. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(3), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i3.1597
[53] Yusuf, M. A., & Taufiq, A. (2020). The dynamic views of kiais in response to the government regulations for the development of pesantren. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i1.6716
[54] Yusuph, D. G., & Oniye, O. I. (2022). An Examination of Salafiyyah Scholars’ Discourse on Kneeling and Bending as Manners of Greeting in Islam. Pakistan Journal of Qur’ānic Studies, 2(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.52461/pjqs.v2i2.2375
[55] Zaenuri, A., & Yusuf, H. (2021). Pesantren Al-Khairaat of Gorontalo: Hadrāmī Tradition and Habāib Domination Ahmad. Jurnal Penelitian, 18(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v18i1.3492
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The AJIE content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain unrestricted copyright and publishing rights of their articles. Authors grant the Publisher the Affairs Al-Hayat Al-Istiqomah Foundation a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use or reuse the article freely as long as its original authors and citation details are identified.
